Sha’i ben-Tekoa: Obama Must Be Removed April 12, 2015
From the Mind of Sha’i ben-Tekoa
כד ניסן תשע”ה / Date: April 12, 2015
Parasha: Tazria-Metzora / מצורה-תזריט
Title: Obama Must Be Removed
Copyright Sha’i ben-Tekoa 2014
Shalom laYehudim, Shalom laBnai Noach, Shalom laGoyim.
It’s the evening of the 2nd day kafdales beNisan, tav-shin-ayin-heh, Parashas Tazria-Metzora, the evening of the 1st day, Sunday, 12 April 2015, webcasting from the Source, homeland of the G-d Who moves history.
Well, just before Pesach started, ten days ago, the President of the United States said the United States had reached an “historic understanding with Iran, a deal that meets our objectives”…and Iran has also “met all its obligations.”
Since then men whose opinions I respect have all, basically, exposed these remarks as baseless. What Iran says happened in Lausanne is not what Obama says, not by a country mile. Two different versions of reality.
I am afraid, ladies and gentlemen, we are witness to another instance of the mind of Barack Hussein Obama who told us the Ft. Hood massacre had nothing to do with Islam and “If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor.” To yours truly, not only do I find his behavior virtually clinical, I despair of a Congress impotent before the truth that this man must be removed from office as expeditiously as possible.
This smells like another Benghazi when unhappy with that outcome, Obama and Hillary Clinton concocted a ridiculous and dishonest story of a video in California. There is also a video of Hillary solemnly telling the relatives of the four dead American security men that she was going to get that guy in California who made that offensive video.
In other words, Obama is at it again as he was with Hillary then: telling stories that are not true. A couple of years ago, I heard what sounded like a credible interview on the Net, a radio program with a woman who said she knew Obama as a teenager in Hawaii and he was always telling stories that were untrue.
This man must be removed from office. More than once, he has spoken of Islam being a part of America from the beginning; that was not true.
He said, “Muslims served in the armed forces in America history; they won Nobel Prizes.” Not true.
Notice too how like a true Hamite hungry for what belongs to others, he invents a fictitious right to the coveted object. There he was claiming for Islam a share in American history to which it is not entitled.
So every analyst I read over the last ten days all took note of the chasm between what Iran is saying and what Obama is saying about what did or did not happen in Lausanne.
You know, he and Hillary Clinton deserve each other for their mutual ability to break rules that govern others and when in office, for both of them, all that matters is one’s political career. There is no fidelity to the community of Americans at large.
Today Hillary was to announce her run, a second one, for the White House. Has this woman no shame? In her first campaign, she swaggered that she was the one the country wanted to be answering the phone at 3 o’clock in the morning. Well, it did not come at that hour, but did come from Benghazi one evening with bad news of the situation there, and Hillary’s behavior, as secretary of state in that episode, must disqualify her as having the right stuff to be commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces.
What else is it in her career that leads her to believe she is fit for the job? What has she ever done? What has she ever said?
I cannot believe, but it’s true, that United States of America with its 300 million-plus people, all the people now can come up with as a national leader of one of the two great parties is Hillary Clinton? This proven nobody? This incompetent? This liar? This violator of regulations regarding emails?
Something is radically rotten in a society that throws up as a leader Hillary Clinton who wanted to make it in a man’s world.
Anyway, this alleged Iran deal of ten days ago that Obama was proudly announcing seems to be yet another in the history of his Muslim-like behavior in which there is no fidelity to truth. One can say whatever one wants in order to defend oneself and achieve one’s objective, to satisfy one’s appetite. Seen from another angle, though, Obama’s behavior defines him as a mortal enemy of Israel and the West, which includes the U.S. The proof of the pudding is in the eating and what he is leading up is an Iran with an atomic bomb. This fool even tripped himself up the other day in admitting that after ten years after his historic agreement, Iran will have the bomb.
This man must be stopped. There is a way but unfortunately not one Congressman wants to lead the charge.
But there is cause for optimism in Senator Chuck Schumer’s choosing to favor legislation binding this man. In my time in New York last month, I got a sense that even liberals are no longer making excuses for him.
Obama is saying this framework will lead to an historic agreement, but the Iranians and no less the French are not saying that at all. Obama said, if you remember a few years ago, that the chemical weapons used in Syria were a red line for him, but when Assad crossed the red line, Obama looked away.
He has repeatedly said he will not allow Iran to have the bomb, but everything he does leads to that very eventuality.
Which is it? His words or the results of his behavior?
Thomas Sowell said Obama’s big achievement in his own eyes was preventing Israel from striking Iran when he threatened to shoot down Israeli planes.
No doubt. As I pointed out in a recent American Thinker piece, this man slapped the American Jewish community in the face within ten minutes of taking the oath of office, and then went on to insult Israel’s democratically-elected leader numerous times and thus insult the Israeli electorate as a whole.
The next day after his first inaugural speech, he called Abu Mazen, his first call, and so we can make the case that from the get-go, this man has had Israel on the brain, up there in the forefront of his frontal lobe, I fear.
One must ask how a man of seeming average intelligence like him can see the positive result of sanctions imposed on Iran that brought them to the table, and then reverse himself and choose to lift these sanctions before Iran has complied with American demands. This behavior makes no sense.
Obama, the chronic liar, ran for office as a hard-liner on Iran and its nuclear ambitions, and now it appears that was a lie too. He said what he thought was politically advantageous at the moment in his quest for power, with no necessary connection to his truest and deepest thoughts and desires. In a nutshell, he was practicing Islamic ‘taqqiya’, dissembling, lying.
He is always lying. With Muslims like him, it is a way of life, a way to get through the day. A symbol of Islam is the crescent moon which is a body half in sunlight, have cloaked in total darkness. What you see is not necessarily what you get.
This man has to be stopped. Whatever his motivations, he has for six years in office done nothing to stop Iran from building atomic bombs, and one component is his belief, I believe, that Iran has a right to atomic weapons like the U.S., France, Britain, Russia, China, Pakistan and above all Israel. For Obama, this prohibition smacks of racism and “Islamophobia.”
In any case, whatever he thinks and feels in the deepest recesses of his being, he is failing utterly in his stated goal of preventing Iran from having the bomb.
So will the real Obama please stand up? The one who says he won’t let Iran make a bomb or the one who agrees to one in ten years?
G-d willing, the U.S. Congress comes to its senses, girds its loins, and impeaches him, which, for those who don’t know, is not the same as being removed from office. It is only the first step. To impeach, from the Latin for sin, is to cast into question the integrity of the man in office. You impeach, you doubt his honesty. For sure there is a ton of material of Obama’s behavior over six years to doubt his honesty.
It is simply disheartening that Congress has put up with this man as long as they have.
So in sum, analysts of the doings at Lausanne and the veracity of Obama’s version, have persuaded me it is another Obama flight from reality.
One only wishes that Prime Minister Netanyahu was even stronger in his condemnation of Lausanne, not only the details of the talks but the very fact they are held at all when Iran is today’s successor to Nazi Germany in its lunatic hatred of this generation’s six million Jews in Israel whose independence, lives, communities, must be destroyed, G-d forbid.
Last Thursday, JPost reported that in early May, Iran will host its Second International Holocaust Cartoon Contest. There will be over 800 antiJew cartoons on display, all mocking the Holocaust. The exhibit is to last 12 days. Over three hundred artists from all over the Muslim world will be there.
This is Iran today: a nation of Holocaust Deniers and mockers, and therefore a nation of lunatics as crazy about Jews as the Germans were in the 1920s, 30s and 40s.
In the West, a Holocaust Denying lunatic like Dr. David Irving, the PhD historian, denies the Holocaust and is judged a lunatic, a madman.
But in the East, the highest powers in the land are all Holocaust Deniers. What kind of a sick society is Iran that it holds such an event for artists who mock the Holocaust, that episode in the 20th century of satanic violence and the murder of millions?
This is Iran today, where soul mates of David Irving are in charge and wanting to build an atomic bomb to destroy Israel, G-d forbid.
No one can say that this is Jewish paranoia talking. During the negotiations in Lausanne two weeks ago, what, the Iranian Chief of Staff relished in public the prospect of doing just that. The Chief of Staff, not some academic crackpot like David Irving.
Here is Obama saying in public that he had his historic agreement, though ten years down the road they will have an atomic bomb.
So I wish Prime Minister Netanyahu would highlight more than he does, if at all, the insane Jew-hatred in Teheran and its relationship to Nazi Jew-hatred.
This business of sitting politely across the table from these Nazi-like Iranian Muslims is inherently an abomination. All of the P5+1 countries, I think, have been victims, one way or another, of Iranian aggression, and for that they should have declared war against Iran years ago.
What Bibi should do is drop the example of Munich 1938, the sellout of Czechoslovakia, and shine a different light on the Evian Conference two months earlier when dozens of states discussed the tidal wave of Jewish refugees while barring a representative of the Jewish Agency in Palestine authorized by the League of Nations. Bibi might demand a seat at that table in Lausanne as the P5+1 discuss the fate of Israel. It is simply outrageous that the P5 +1 negotiate over atomic weapons with these Nazi-like Iranians and exclude a seat at the table for the State of Israel, the principle object of Iran’s satanic nuclear fantasies.
I admit it is a tall order to confront the existence today of a nation as big and as powerful as Iran which shamelessly broadcasts its hunger to slaughter millions of Jews and deny us freedom from Muslim domination. The same day JPost reported on this upcoming cartoon festival in Teheran, there was an international news brief on a candidate in Finland representing one of the largest parties who said Israel systematically murders Balestinian children, women and elderly people. This 37 year-old candidate is a native of Somalia who migrated to Finland at age 16, and he said this systematic murder of Balestinian children, women and the elderly “happened less than a year ago.”
Clearly, a delusional man. Had there been such Israeli evil, for sure in our tiny country the world would have known about it. This man is less thinking then hallucinating alleged Jewish behavior the Jews do not engage in.
A man like this in Finland, this presumptive Muslim, is of course a news item because he is such a stand out in that society for his delusion.
But not in his native Somalia or in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria. This type of thinking which is so odd in the West, in the East is normal. Nothing out of the ordinary for hundreds of millions of Muslims to think the Jews are agents of Satan. I wish Prime Minister Netanyahu would criticize not only the nuts and bolts of these dreadful negotiations but illuminate just who it is we are dealing with: this generation’s version of Nazi Germany in its aggression and demented hatred of Jews.
Truly a death cult for holding mass demonstrations from time to time in which thousands chant “Death to America! Death to Israel!” These people revel in death. In Tehran, a major civic monument is a fountain forever running with red water symbolic of the bloodshed in Iran’s 8-year war with Iraq in the 1980s.
It is a society in which young men once a year celebrate in the street with razor blades in their hands that they use to slash their own scalps to make them bleed profusely. They revel in blood pouring down their faces.
Iran is a country that must be throttled and that only can be done with serious economic sanctions and/or military might. It cannot be accomplished by talking in Lausanne. The very existence of the talks is evidence of the downfall of the West.
And all because at the center of their discussion is the Land of Israel, the target most threatened by a nuclear Iran. Thus the West is torn between its rational mind that sees in Iran a threat not only to Israel but the West itself, as a whole, which is why it would pay to ally with Israel.
But then it is torn in the other direction by its age-old hatred of Jews. For the P5 +1 goyim in Lausanne, the threat to Israel’s existence posed by a nuclear Iran might even make some of them smile.
On the bright side of things, it was encouraging, the day Obama announced his phantasmagorical historic agreement, that in London, British Home Secretary Theresa May had some choice words for domestic Muslims with a chip on their shoulder.
If memory serves, Theresa May was formerly head of MI5, the domestic security agency, when Scotland Yard said it was keeping an eye on over a thousand potentially violent Muslims. May sounds as if she has a bit of Margaret Thatcher in her.
She said, “There is increasing evidence that a small but significant number of people living in Britain, almost all of whom, are British citizens reject our values…They utterly reject British and Western values, including democracy, the rule of law, and equality between citizens regardless of their gender, ethnicity, religion or sexuality. They believe that it’s impossible to be a good Muslim and a good British citizen. And they dismiss anybody who disagrees with them, including other Muslims as kafirs or non-believers. Intolerance, hatred and bigotry become normalized…”
Of course her remarks sparked charges of “Islamophobia.”
May has announced a series of proposals for combatting Islamic extremism in all its forms. It’s part of David Cameron’s re-election campaign a month from now. May said a future Tory government would ban Islamic preachers of hate, shut down extremist mosques and review the use of Sharia law in British courts in England and Wales.
She wants measures against Islam in prisons, against honor killings, female genital mutilation, against forced marriage.
Coincidentally, a week later, a 40-page report by House of Lords member Baroness Caroline Cox on Sharia courts and their abuse of Muslim women made news. She is a leading defender of women’s rights in the U.K. and also apparently now joined the resistance to Islam’s ignoring of British values.
This is a healthy sign, of fighting back.
Likewise, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott was reported recently to have announced a new national security crackdown in the wake of last December’s horror in a café in Sydney committed by another one of Obama’s beloved Muslims. Three people murdered that day by yet another Muslim maniac, a month before the Charlie Hebdo horror in Paris.
Austria too in late February passed a new law blocking support for Islam from abroad – funds from aboard – while declaring that Austrian law is superior to Sharia law.
The Turks were particularly bothered by being prevented from funneling money to Muslims in Austria. Most of the students in Vienna’s middle and secondary schools are now Muslims and soon the majority of elementary school children will be too.
Islam is on the march, but don’t expect deracinated post-Christians and their post-Jewish soul mates to pay attention. Today Hillary Clinton was to announce her desire and readiness to command the United States Armed Forces, and there to support her were three of Hollywood’s most powerful Jews: Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg. Some of Steven Spielberg’s movies are enchanting. He’s a true artist, but like too many artists he cannot think politically. Few of them can. Like Israel’s three most popular novelists, Amos Oz, A.B. Yehoshua and David Grossman. Whatever their talents as writers of stories — fiction– that never happened, when it comes to the real world and thinking politically of the clash of nations, they are wildly incompetent. What are these three Jews doing supporting this miserable woman Hillary Clinton?
This is patriotism? This is narcissism.
Last but not least, the Obama administration proudly announced last Wednesday that it had opened a gender-neutral bathroom for staff in the White House. Yeah. Further evidence of the plague messing up the minds of Western man these days, leading them to think gender is a feeling inside and not at all necessarily connected to one’s external reproductive capabilities. It is the age of the transgender whose self-diagnosis is that his mind is just fine; it’s his body that is wrong and needs fixing. It is an age of madness.
Leila tov miEretz haKodesh.
Sha’i ben-Tekoa was born, raised and educated in the United States of America. He received a B.A. in Comparative Religion from Columbia University and did graduate work in same at the University of Chicago Divinity School. A traveler in Arab lands, he served in the Yom Kippur War effort of 1973. His articles on the Arab-Israeli conflict, terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, National Review, Midstream, Congress Monthly and other publications. He appeared on American Public Broadcasting’s The MacNeil-Lehrer NewsHour. In preparation for 1991’s historic Arab-Israeli peace conference in Madrid, he worked on assignment for the Office of the Prime Minister of Israel Yitzhak Shamir. He was formerly lead English language commentator for Shamir. He was formerly lead English language commentator for IsraelNationalNews.com.
Sha’i broadcasts his Internet radio commentary and music program from the hills of Judea 3 nights a week. These webcasts, other articles & videos can be seen or heard by signing up on his Website:www.deprogramprogram.com.
Related Posts on our Website: WinstonIsraelInsight.com
Sha’i Ben-Tekoa: “Obama Must Be Removed” Date: April 12, 2015
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “The Chosen People and Dual Loyalty” April 2, 2015
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “Bibi’s Speech” March 3, 2015
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “Who Is Disrespecting Whom?” March 1, 2015
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “WHAT BIBI SHOULD SAY” Feb. 25, 2015
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “JEWS & DEMOCRACY” Nov. 23, 2014
Sha’i ben Tekoa: “Bibi Is Right on the Temple Mount” Nov. 2, 2014
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “All Islam Is Guilty” Sep. 4, 2014
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “Hamas Must Be Destroyed” Aug. 3, 2014
Sha’i ben-Tekoa: “It’s a Mental Disorder” June 19, 2014
About the Author
Sha’i ben-Tekoa is the author of the book: Phantom Nation: Inventing the “Palestinians” as the Obstacle to Peace available at Amazon.com on Kindle or 3 Volume Paperback. Check out the reviews on Amazon.com Book Description: Publication Date: January 4, 2014
If you are a supporter of Israel, “Phantom Nation” is a must-read book. If you support the putatively Paleolithic “Palestinians,” you had better read this book. Sha’i ben-Tekoa skewers the myth of a “Palestinian” nation with rights to land the League of Nations specifically recognized as Jewish. The author, hired for a research project by the Office of Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir discovered the first mention ever in a United Nations resolution of “Palestinians” in the year 1970, three years after Israel conquered Judea and Samaria, a.k.a. the “West Bank.” The author also shows how this very no-name of a name, “West Bank,” had to be invented for hills the Arabs never had a name for. Hence, the sterile, topographical description lacking all historical associations, which exposes the fraud that is the “Palestinian” counter-claim to land the League said was Jewish. Before 1959, when Gamal Nasser of Egypt conjured up the idea of a phantom “Palestinian” nation, the record of Holy Land history is perfectly empty of any mention of them.
After Ben-Tekoa’s government assignment ended, he went in search of the full story surrounding the birth of this allegedly archaic community, and the story he tells covers the entire sweep of Zionist and Israeli history, its wars and waves of Arab and Muslim massacres (terrorism) and the birth of this notional nation a Biblical generation of forty years after the League of Nations’ decision. He likens the rise of “Palestinian Nationalism” to Holocaust Denial as a twin perversion of history; as our generation’s successor ideology to medieval Christianity and Nazism as forms of homicidal anti-Semitism. It is our time’s way of justifying the mass murder of Jews. “Phantom Nation” is also a crackling, riveting, great read.
Related Posts on WinstonIsraelInsight.com: “Sha’i Ben-Tekoa” Category
Sha’i Ben-Tekoa “Bibi’s Speech” March 3, 2015 Published Mar. 11, 2015
Sha’i Ben-Tekoa:”WHAT BIBI SHOULD SAY” 2/25/15 Pub. Mar. 3, 2015
Sha’i Ben-Tekoa: “Who Is Disrespecting Whom?” March 1, 2015
Sha’i Ben-Tekoa: ‘JEW & DEMOCRACY’ Nov. 23, 2014
Sha’i Ben-Tekoa: MADMEN & IMBECILES Nov. 13, 2014
Sha’i Ben-Tekoah “Another Muhammad Al-Dura?” July 03, 2014